Items
-
What do the Council candidates have to say about "neighborhoods"? -
Johns Hopkins has never used an implosion to demolish a building -
Bethlehem is essentially supporting the demolition without investigating the health hazard -
Concrete -- lime -- sand -- silica -
The May 9 night meeting Q&A on the Martin Tower demolition -
Risk tolerance should not be the default position of public officials -
Beginning at the beginning, finally -
The only reasonable health message is "we strongly advise" people not to be outside and to wear a respirator if they are within, say 2 kilometers -
What are "they" saying about the health risk from watching the Martin Tower demolition outside? -
Absentee ballot deadline looms -
Post 45 now has responses from both candidates -- if you have already viewed 45, please return to view again -
Council Candidates: 2-year seat: Prompt 7 -
Council Candidates: 4-year seat: Prompt 7 -
Mother's Day question for the Bethlehem historians -
Paige Van Wirt at the Bethlehem City Democratic Committee Forum May 6 -
Two possibilities for the silence of the Health people -
Let's stop the rush to development -
"Where are the Health people?" Gadfly asks at the public meeting on the Martin Tower demolition -
Gadfly cross-examines at the Thursday stakeholder meeting on the Martin Tower demolition -
"data and advice to citizens should come from people who are impartial" -
Look at the Didcot Power station incident, and the Sheraton in Bal Harbour, Florida -
"Windows and doors closed, tape up, and fingers and toes crossed" -
Concrete dust more caustic than Drano -
Agreeing wholeheartedly with Breena's "Observations" -
Observations on the Martin Tower Implosion Meeting